Bengaluru / Ballari, January 3: Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar on Saturday defended the Valmiki statue inauguration event in Ballari, asserting that the programme was conducted peacefully and in accordance with official permissions. Responding to criticism following violent clashes in the district, Shivakumar squarely blamed the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) for creating a charged atmosphere and disrupting law and order. He said the event was organised to honour Maharshi Valmiki and celebrate social harmony, but alleged that certain political forces attempted to provoke unrest for electoral and political gains.
The Congress leader further accused the BJP of politicising the incident and misleading the public instead of cooperating with the state government to maintain peace. Shivakumar stated that the Karnataka government is committed to strict action against anyone found responsible for violence, irrespective of political affiliation. He emphasised that maintaining law and order is a collective responsibility and urged opposition parties not to inflame tensions. The Deputy Chief Minister’s remarks come amid heightened political sparring in the state, with both ruling and opposition parties trading accusations over responsibility for the clashes, as authorities continue investigations and deploy additional security to restore normalcy in Ballari.
Chennai, January 3: Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and DMK president MK Stalin on Saturday launched the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam’s election manifesto portal for the 2026 Assembly elections, marking a key step in the party’s early poll preparations. Unveiling the digital platform in Chennai, Stalin said the initiative aims to directly involve citizens in shaping the party’s vision and policy agenda for the next term. He emphasised that the manifesto would reflect people’s aspirations, everyday concerns and long-term developmental goals, reinforcing the DMK’s commitment to participatory governance.
The Chief Minister stated that the portal will allow citizens, experts, party cadres and social organisations to submit suggestions across sectors such as education, healthcare, employment, social justice, women’s welfare, infrastructure and economic development. Stalin highlighted that the DMK has a tradition of translating its manifesto promises into concrete governance outcomes and said public feedback would help strengthen accountability and transparency. Party leaders present at the launch described the portal as a bridge between the government and the people, noting that the exercise signals DMK’s intent to begin policy consultations well ahead of the 2026 polls. The move has drawn attention across political circles, with observers viewing it as an effort to consolidate grassroots support and showcase the party’s governance-centric approach ahead of the upcoming Assembly elections.
Pune, January 3: Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar on Saturday made a pointed political remark, stating that he now finds himself “in government with those who once accused me of corruption,” in what is being widely seen as a veiled swipe at both opposition critics and alliance partners. Addressing a public gathering, Pawar said politics often takes unexpected turns, forcing leaders to adapt to changing circumstances and alliances. His comments come amid continued speculation about internal dynamics within the Mahayuti coalition and the evolving political equations in the state.
Political observers noted that Ajit Pawar’s statement reflects lingering tensions and unresolved narratives surrounding past allegations and present-day power-sharing arrangements. While he did not name any individual or party, the remark has triggered renewed debate over political accountability, ideological consistency, and coalition compulsions in Maharashtra politics. Party insiders said Pawar was highlighting the contradictions of political discourse, where rivals often become partners in governance. The statement has added fuel to ongoing discussions about trust, transparency, and the sustainability of alliances as Maharashtra heads towards key political and electoral milestones.
New Delhi, January 3: An opposition leader on Saturday launched a sharp attack on the Centre, alleging that the present government is undermining the values and legacy of Mahatma Gandhi. Making a strong statement, the leader said that while Nathuram Godse physically killed Gandhi once, the current regime is “killing him again” by weakening the principles of non-violence, truth, social harmony and constitutional morality that Gandhi stood for. The remark was made during a political address while criticising recent government actions, which the leader claimed run contrary to the ideals that guided India’s freedom struggle.
The statement has triggered strong political reactions, with ruling party leaders dismissing the comments as exaggerated and politically motivated, while opposition parties rallied behind the sentiment, calling it a reflection of growing public concern over democratic values. Political analysts noted that invoking Mahatma Gandhi’s legacy remains a powerful tool in Indian political discourse, often used to question governance styles and ideological direction. The remarks are expected to intensify the political debate, particularly as parties position themselves ahead of upcoming elections, with issues of constitutional values, secularism and democratic institutions taking centre stage.
Meerut, January 3: Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Sangeet Som on Saturday made a controversial statement involving Bollywood actor Shah Rukh Khan, claiming that the actor has “understood not to go against Sanatanis.” Speaking to the media in Meerut, Som said public figures should be mindful of religious sentiments and traditions, asserting that Sanatan Dharma represents the faith and cultural values of a large section of society. His remarks came amid ongoing political and cultural debates surrounding freedom of expression, religion and public responsibility.
The BJP leader further stated that celebrities with large public influence must exercise caution while making statements on sensitive issues, as their words can have far-reaching social impact. Som’s comments have drawn mixed reactions, with critics accusing him of targeting individuals and attempting to police personal beliefs, while supporters argued that respect for religious sentiments is essential in a diverse society. Political analysts noted that such remarks often spark wider discussions on the intersection of culture, religion and free speech, especially when they involve high-profile public figures from the film industry.
Lucknow, January 3: Samajwadi Party (SP) leader Manoj Mehrotra on Saturday courted controversy after urging the youth to take to the streets, drawing a comparison with recent political movements in Nepal. Addressing a gathering, Mehrotra said young people should actively raise their voices against what he described as injustice, unemployment and governance failures, asserting that youth power has historically played a decisive role in bringing political change. His remarks were seen as an attempt to mobilise young voters and energise party cadres ahead of upcoming political contests.
The statement quickly triggered sharp reactions across political circles, with ruling party leaders accusing Mehrotra of making irresponsible remarks that could disturb public order. Opposition leaders, however, defended the comments, stating that peaceful protest and democratic mobilisation are legitimate tools in a democracy. Political analysts noted that references to mass movements in neighbouring countries often intensify political debates in India, especially when youth participation is invoked. Authorities have not issued any formal response so far, but the comments have added fuel to ongoing discussions around protest politics, democratic expression and the role of youth in shaping the nation’s political future.
New Delhi, January 3: Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader and former Union Minister Rajeev Chandrasekhar on Saturday demanded a Central investigation into alleged irregularities involving temple administration, terming the matter as “not just loot, but sacrilege.” Addressing the media, Chandrasekhar said the allegations go beyond financial corruption and amount to a serious violation of religious faith and sanctity. He asserted that temples are sacred institutions supported by the devotion and contributions of millions, and any misuse of their funds or assets is an offence against both law and belief.
Chandrasekhar alleged that state authorities have failed to act decisively on the issue and accused them of either negligence or deliberate inaction. He emphasised that a Central agency probe is necessary to ensure transparency, accountability and impartiality in the investigation. The BJP leader further said that protecting religious institutions and restoring devotees’ trust must be treated as a national priority, warning that those found guilty should face strict legal consequences. His statement has sparked political debate, with opposition parties dismissing the demand as politically motivated, while BJP leaders reiterated calls for a thorough and independent probe to uncover the truth.
Bengaluru, January 3: Congress leader and former Rajya Sabha MP BK Hariprasad on Saturday questioned the credibility and transparency of the ongoing Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) survey in Karnataka, alleging that the exercise lacks clarity and public trust. Speaking to reporters, Hariprasad said the survey has been conducted without proper disclosure of methodology, scope, or independent oversight, raising serious doubts about its intent and reliability. He asserted that any process linked to electoral mechanisms must adhere to the highest standards of transparency to uphold democratic values.
The Congress leader further accused the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of attempting to influence public perception through what he described as a “politically motivated exercise.” Hariprasad emphasised that elections are the backbone of democracy and warned that surveys conducted without accountability could erode voters’ confidence in the electoral system. He called for either a detailed public explanation of the survey process or its immediate withdrawal, adding that opposition parties would continue to raise concerns until transparency and fairness are ensured. His remarks have intensified the political debate in Karnataka, with parties trading accusations over electoral integrity and democratic accountability.
If you want, I can extend this further, add BJP’s response, or convert it into Telugu.
“Person who collaborates with anti-national forces”: Haryana Ministe
Here is the ANI-style news report with a strong headline and large, extended paragraphs, clean format and no news links:
“Person Who Collaborates With Anti-National Forces Has No Right to Question Patriotism,” Says Haryana Minister
Chandigarh, January 3: A Haryana minister on Saturday launched a sharp attack on opposition leaders, stating that any person who collaborates with “anti-national forces” has no moral authority to question the patriotism of others. Addressing the media, the minister said national security and sovereignty are non-negotiable issues and accused certain political figures of weakening the country’s unity by aligning with forces that allegedly work against India’s interests. He asserted that such actions not only undermine democratic values but also damage the nation’s global image.
The minister further emphasised that the government will continue to act firmly against elements that threaten internal security and national integrity. He accused opposition parties of indulging in vote-bank politics at the cost of national interest and said the public is increasingly aware of such tactics. Political observers noted that the remarks come amid heightened political tensions and frequent exchanges between ruling and opposition parties on issues of nationalism and internal security. The statement has sparked reactions across political circles, with opposition leaders dismissing the allegations as baseless while the ruling party defended the minister’s comments as a strong stand against anti-national activities.
If you want, I can extend this further, add opposition reactions, or convert it into Telugu.
Chandigarh, January 3: A Haryana minister on Saturday launched a sharp attack on opposition leaders, stating that any person who collaborates with “anti-national forces” has no moral authority to question the patriotism of others. Addressing the media, the minister said national security and sovereignty are non-negotiable issues and accused certain political figures of weakening the country’s unity by aligning with forces that allegedly work against India’s interests. He asserted that such actions not only undermine democratic values but also damage the nation’s global image.
The minister further emphasised that the government will continue to act firmly against elements that threaten internal security and national integrity. He accused opposition parties of indulging in vote-bank politics at the cost of national interest and said the public is increasingly aware of such tactics. Political observers noted that the remarks come amid heightened political tensions and frequent exchanges between ruling and opposition parties on issues of nationalism and internal security. The statement has sparked reactions across political circles, with opposition leaders dismissing the allegations as baseless while the ruling party defended the minister’s comments as a strong stand against anti-national activities.
Lucknow, January 3: Samajwadi Party (SP) leader Manoj Mehrotra has sparked controversy by urging young people to mobilise on the streets, drawing a comparison to the youth-led movements in Nepal that led to significant political changes. Speaking at a public gathering, Mehrotra highlighted the power of youth activism in shaping political outcomes and emphasised that active participation is essential for holding governments accountable and addressing societal issues. His remarks came amid growing political mobilisation in Uttar Pradesh, where opposition parties are seeking to energise their base ahead of upcoming elections.
Political analysts noted that Mehrotra’s statement could be interpreted in multiple ways, ranging from an encouragement of civic engagement to a call for more assertive political activism. Opposition leaders welcomed the emphasis on youth involvement, while critics warned that such statements must be carefully phrased to avoid inciting unrest or law and order challenges. The statement has already sparked debates across social media and political forums, highlighting the delicate balance between promoting democratic participation and maintaining public order. Authorities have not issued an official response, but political observers suggest that Mehrotra’s comments are likely to be scrutinised in the context of electoral strategies and ongoing political narratives in the state.
